Setup of the Hi-Hat, one of the more irritating things with these, is a lot simpler, and more effective with Superior. With ezDrummer, you may have to change MIDI notes within your module, whereas Superior will learn the notes from your module, and adapt. It's much easier to setup MIDI with Superior. I'm still on old 32-bit XP.Īs far as functionality of Superior 2.0 and ezDrummer, Superior wins hands down. I too have heard of Vista 64-bit issues, but not first hand. If you are interested in having a stable platform and not having to tweak all the time, stay away from the 64 bit OS.īest of luck and be sure to let us know what your experiences are when you've had a chance to play with things a bit. Thats just my opinion, but I'm a gamer as well and spend a lot of time in other online communities and I see the same thing everywhere. So many people have experienced so many compatibility difficulties with Vista 64 that I have made a conscious effort to steer clear. At least until you've had some time to play with ezD to see if it meets your needs. My opinion based on what you've said so far, don't bother with S2.0. ezDrummer was easy to get set up and working. As for actual e-drum (v-drum) support, I really didn't see much difference. Couple that with the fact that they are both made by Toontrack, and that ezdrummer expansions work like a hot damn with S2.0, it's hard to go wrong starting with ezD to get a feel for things, and then uprgrading to S2.0 later if necessary. That being said, if you don't require a complex set of tweaking tools and just want to make some noise without too much hassle, then nothing beats ezDrummer. I've used both and can confirm that S2.0 is far superior to ezDrummer.
0 kommentar(er)
